Jewelry photography needs sharp metallic edges, transparent prong areas, and zero halos. Generic cutout tools struggle with reflective surfaces and complex chain links. PixelAPI's matting model handles jewelry detail with edge-aware processing — production-ready for catalog work.
Jewelry photography needs sharp metallic edges, transparent prong areas, and zero halos. Generic cutout tools struggle with reflective surfaces and complex chain links. PixelAPI's matting model handles jewelry detail with edge-aware processing — production-ready for catalog work. Typical integration takes under 30 minutes — make a POST, receive a public URL, store it in your CDN.
curl -X POST https://api.pixelapi.dev/v1/image/remove-background \
-H "X-API-Key: $PIXELAPI_KEY" \
-F "[email protected]"
# response: { "output_url": "https://...transparent.png", "credits_used": 10 }| Volume per month | Plan | Cost | Per-image price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 100 images | Free tier | $0 | $0 (free credits) |
| 1,000 images | Starter ($10/mo) | $10 | $0.010 |
| 6,000 images | Pro ($50/mo) | $50 | $0.0083 |
| 30,000 images | Scale ($200/mo) | $200 | $0.0067 |
Yes — production-ready. The matting model handles fine edges (hair, lace, jewelry chains, pet fur, glass) without halos or fringe. We process tens of thousands of jewelry images per day for paying customers.
No separate bulk endpoint — call the regular endpoint in a loop. Free tier has 10 requests/minute; Starter 60/min; Pro 300/min; Scale unlimited. Most jewelry customers run an overnight cron processing the day's catalog uploads.
Comparable quality, ~11–20× cheaper. We've tested on 1,000-image sample sets across product, fashion, and lifestyle photography — output is essentially indistinguishable from premium competitors at one-tenth the cost. Try 500 free credits and benchmark on your own data.